

This is Important, Not Important.
Every week, we help {{active_subscriber_count}}+ humans understand and unfuck the rapidly changing world around us. Join us.

WHATβS IN A NAME?
βTell Cersei. I want her to know it was me.β
There are a million legitimate reasons why standing up to bullies may require a pseudonym (and a cowl), or even anonymity.
As has been clear for centuries, and even more so in this moment of inescapable mass surveillance, some of us β by nature of our birth nation, skin color, ethnicity, sex, gender, religious beliefs, and/or who we love β are in far more clear and present danger than someone like me.
And yet β millions of people over decades and centuries have stood in broad daylight and put their names and their bodies, their finite time and resources to the test, on the line, to fight for a better future for themselves and the generations to come.
Most of those have been those most marginalized or directly threatened, who had nowhere to hide, who didnβt have a choice but to put their name and face into the ring. Meanwhile, wealthy people have hidden behind their names and titles for a very long time.
That isnβt the rule: some privileged β safer β people chose to be allies β chose activism β over silence, too. Our predecessors imagined and constructed, often in the aftermath of great violence, the institutions that increased peace, childhood life expectancies, knowledge and more.
But itβs time for more. Much more.
More recently, The World Wide Web has provided both a safe haven for anonymous discourse and activism, and also lots and lots of harm from a distance, through mis and disinformation or just actively planning genocides and hate crimes.
Unfortunately, network effects and monopolies have meant most discourse and organizing, both good and bad, has been consolidated into just a few unfathomably large platforms, all of which are protected (to an extent, kind of) by 26 words that made the internet β Section 230.
What Section 230 is really protecting a platform from is dangerous β but supposedly not quite criminal β speech.
So, user generated content.
When we built the underlying social infrastructure of What Can I Do?, we decided not to allow for almost any user generated content, besides a headshot and a short bio for your profile. One picture, one single text field.
The most significant reason why we made that choice is because we simply do not have the resources to moderate UGC of any kind, much less dangerous or criminal speech, pictures, threats, whatever. Itβs the internet β every open text field is asking for trouble. But also, plenty of other platforms allow you to express yourself in any number of characters. You donβt have to go home, but you canβt stay here. Best wishes.
So, like the share plate method I used to feed my young kids, virtually everything you can do in the app is something we already chose.
All that said, there was one other open field that we couldnβt eliminate: your name.
Whatβs in a name?
Everybodyβs born with a name, a lot of us earn nicknames, or go by our middle names, or last names.
Sometimes we change our name, sometimes we give our kids our own names, and sometimes our kids have different last names than we do, sometimes not. Some of us have stage names, or legally changed names.
Eventually, one way or another, you present yourself in public in the way that feels most comfortable to you, and everything you do gets attached to that name. If weβre not complete assholes, some part of our name might get handed down to the generations after us. βMake a name for yourselfβ can mean a lot of things but what it usually means is to make it mean something, to somebody, to history.
After a couple hundred thousand years, a few names have persisted, immortalized for one reason or another, remembered in adulation, fondness, or despised, long after our bodies have decomposed back into the soil. As they say, you die two deaths β the real one, and the one when the last person says your name for the last time.
βBury us, and mark our names above. Let us be free.β
Some names are both loved and feared, some attached to deeds in drastically opposing ways (take βObamacareβ, for example). Some cultures have multiple names, some even have secret names.
But for as much as we idolize and put historic figures on pedestals, theyβd be nothing without the movements marching and fighting and voting alongside them, their efforts compounded across millions and decades.
WCID is one tool among many, and like the rest of our work, itβs allied with many other tools and standing on the shoulders of so many organizing platforms before it.
This is humbling and freeing β we can only help change the world. It also means we are freer to have an opinion on how our platform works, because there are so many others that compliment it, where you can express yourself more, more freely, or even not at all.
Our opinion (which is always subject to change!) is that WCID has an opportunity to start connecting and aggregating people in real life again, to establish trust again, and that it will only be as effective as it can be if the people who are following and being followed are real people.
How do we, uh, do that?
First, we cut out the bots.
We rely on Stripe to safely verify the identity of everyone who wants to make their profile public β which is a choice you can totally make on your own. Unfuck the world in private for as long as you want, truly, but either way β youβre a real human.
Second, if you make your profile public, we ask you to share your name. Which isβ¦complicated.
For many people, the name you use most often in public is a close match to your given name, with endless variations on the margin. We (Conor) initially coded the field to ensure you used one of these marginal variations in your profile.
It was a fucking nightmare.
In addition, this regulation ignored the many people who use an entirely different name, for whatever reason, but especially those folks who do so to protect themselves.
Again β we have very, very few resources here. We arenβt Bumble or Instagram. But we also arenβt Discord.
Itβs very, very important to us β and, we think, to rebuilding trust and Compound Action β that someone who takes an action, and inspires you to follow them, is who they say they are, and vice versa.
So hereβs what weβve settled on: We created a field called βDisplay Nameβ, and want you to use the name you use most in public.
No other strings attached, aside from the handy-dandy filter that checks for bad words.
Use the name youβre known for, that youβve already chosen and established for yourself, whether youβre a student, a scientist, a senator, or the CEO of Partners in Health.
Understand, though: when you get verified by Stripe β confirming youβre not a bot β and then put your most well-known name out there on WCID, youβre asking for trust from the community.
βCould you trust yourself to practice trust?β
While WCID doesnβt really offer any opportunities to do bad shit, itβs very important you donβt ask for trust unless you want to earn β and are prepared to carry the burden of β more of it.
Hereβs what it means in practice:
We donβt and canβt track many of the actions you take, so instead we just straight up ask you if you did it or not.

If you click yes, we add it to your Action History, for your reference and for everyone else who follows you. We also use it to intelligently nudge you to take related actions, to help us throw the kitchen sink at whatever problem.
But we also ask you as a test.
We want to trust you. We ask you if you took the action because we trust that by attaching your name to it, youβll answer honestly. That if all the people who took the time to follow you asked you if and why you did it, and how you did it, that youβll have an honest answer youβre proud of.
Every single one of those after-action questions and every one of your WCID followers isnβt for your vanity β itβs an intentional, step-by-step renovation of shared trust.
We are in a moment when itβs clear we canβt just say βIβm one of the good guysβ, throw a black square on our Instagram and call it a day. We all β all β have to go well beyond silence, beyond neutrality.
We judge ourselves by our intentions, but others by their actions, and itβs time we measured up and put our names on the line. When we do, even more people will, and so on, and then weβre unstoppable.
Conor hates when I call WCID a search engine. I imagine heβd also hate it if I called it a social network.
Both of which are fair β itβs neither.
Our search isnβt open world, itβs painstakingly populated by hand. And as described above, our social mechanisms are intentionally limited in flexibility and utility.
But theyβre also much more intentional than just βsearchβ or βget followersβ β the entire point of populating our database with measurable actions, the entire point of following someone on WCID, and of encouraging real people to follow you, is to combine forces IRL to unfuck the world.
Thereβs much more to come there, but we really canβt afford to do superfluous bullshit: because of our bootstrapped resources and long-term theory of Compound Action, we laid foundation very early that we havenβt even begun to build on yet, but couldnβt afford to strap on later.
That said, we have been adding more intentional connective tissue to the app (coming soon!) and today weβre excited and honored to give you the ability to share your name, to use our app to make something even more of your name, to associate yourself with actions designed to unfuck the world for as many people as possible, in a moment when people are genuinely scared to do so.
Iβm asking you to say βThis is who I amβ, and then leave a breadcrumb trail of your most measurable deeds, for others to follow. Thatβs all you can do in our app. Just a bio and a name. No other words.
Will you say βThis is who I amβ and let your actions speak even louder than your words?
Normally Iβd sprinkle a bunch of quotes throughout the post to break things up, to make a point, etc.
But today Iβve dropped a whole bunch below. What Iβd like you to do is read them β slowly, thoughtfully, however short or long β in the context of what weβve talked about here.
When you see βyouβ or βmeβ or βIβ or βourβ or βweβ, imagine the power and stakes of attaching your name to such an action as described, however philosophical. Associate the quotes with yourself. Imagine the author is talking to you, to us, specifically. Calling you out, calling us out, asking us whether weβre up to the task.
Imagine itβs a beloved teacher or coach or mentor saying or writing this to you, specifically.
Imagine them knowing you read it.
Imagine you knowing they know you read it, and now you canβt escape their expectations. Youβve been called upon.
Will you respond?
βOur job is not to feel hope β thatβs optional. Our job is to be hope, and to make space for the chance of a different future.β
β Emily Johnston
βThey tried to bury me. They didn't realize I was a seed.β
β SinΓ©ad OΚΌConnor
βWhat happens when we have eroded trust in media, government, and experts? If you donβt trust me and I donβt trust you, how do we respond to pandemics, or climate change, or have fair and open elections? This is how authoritarianism arisesβwhen you erode trust in institutions.β
β Hany Farid
βIn becoming forcibly and essentially aware of my mortalityβ¦ what I most regretted were my silencesβ¦ My silences had not protected me. Your silence will not protect you.β
β Mary Shelley
βNot through me.β
β Subway passengers protecting Spider-man and a lot of other people who refuse to spread viruses or misinformation
βYou donβt get what you donβt fight for.β
β Elizabeth Warren
βTo sin by silence, when we should protest, makes cowards out of men.β
β Ella Wheeler Wilcox
βWe don't give the public enough opportunities to see and trust warm bodies in public health. Messages must be delivered by real people, preferably the same people, in a style that feels human.β
β Katelyn Jetelina
βThe LIGO Scientific Collaboration involves hundreds of people, many of whom have never met.
They use tools and knowledge contributed by thousands of others, who in turn rely on the tools and knowledge of millions of others. Such organization doesnβt happen by chance: it requires sophisticated technical and social systems, working hand in hand. Trust feeds evidence feeds trust, and so on.
The same holds true for society at large. If we undermine our self-reinforcing systems of evidence and trust, our ability to know anything and do anything will break down.β
β Matthew Hutson
βAlways take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.β
β Elie Wiesel
βCandor is a simple yet profound commitment to reveal and not conceal. Our commitment is to reveal our stories, holding them lightly and expressing them lovingly. At any moment we are either choosing to reveal or to conceal. When we choose revealing weβre choosing trust. When we choose concealing weβre choosing control. Trust is rooted in love and control is rooted in fear. We believe love-based organizations win over fear- based organizations.β
β Jim Dethmer, Diana Chapman, and Kaley Klemp
βAct as if your decisions have moral consequence.β
β I canβt remember
βConsumer trust is not necessarily based on the quality of reporting or the prestige and history of the brand, but on strong parasocial relationships.β
β Charlie Warzel
βNever trust any ruler who puts his faith in tunnels and bunkers and escape routes. The chances are that his heart isnβt in the job.β
β Terry Pratchett
βThe secret of happiness is: find something more important than you are, and dedicate your life to it.β
β Daniel Dennett
βYou can trust us to stick to you through thick and thin β to the bitter end. And you can trust us to keep any secret of yours β closer than you keep it yourself. But you cannot trust us to let you face trouble alone, and go off without a word. We are your friends, Frodo.
Anyway: there it is. We know most of what Gandalf has told you. We know a good deal about the Ring. We are horribly afraid β but we are coming with you; or following you like hounds.ββ
β J.R.R. Tolkien
βDonβt you want to know what youβre capable of?β
β Again, canβt remember, but you get the point. Itβs not what someone else is capable of. Itβs what you, specifically, with your hands, your voice, your skills, your resources, your instrument, your paintbrush, are capable of.
And of course, because this is a community of people who give a shit for a million different reasons:
βI am a part of all that I have met.β
β Tennyson


Last weekβs most popular Action Step was calling your representatives to insist they support the Scientific Integrity Act.
Donate to the Electronic Frontier Foundation to defend digital privacy.
Volunteer with organizing initiatives through Tech Shift, to help build a fairer, more just technological future.
π Get educated about where your data is going online by using the Markupβs Blacklight tool.
π Be heard about unlocking global energy data so that researchers worldwide have access to it.
Invest in tech for good and use your capital to scale climate tech with Carbon Equity.
π = Global Action Step
NEW: Find the action steps that mean the most to you at WhatCanIDo.Earth


Weβre 100% independent and proudly supported by readers like you.
Members get a 30 day free trial to:
Ad-free everything
Your What Can I Do? profile: save & favorite your action steps, connect with other Shit Givers
Vibe Check: Our news homepage, curated daily just for you. Never doomscroll again, thx
Seriously?: The frameworks, models, history, and pop culture we use to understand whatβs happening now and next
Half Baked: Weekly briefs to help you think and act on specific, timely issues as they happen
Not Important: My favorite books, art, movies, music, apps, and more that have nothing to do with the jet stream slowing down
Lifetime thanks for directly supporting our work
πββοΈ Vote!

π€ Thanks for reading. Hereβs how we can help you directly:
βοΈ Work with Quinn 1:1 (slots are extremely limited) - book time to talk climate strategy, investing, or anything else.
π― Sponsor the newsletter - reach {{active_subscriber_count}} (and counting) sustainably-minded consumers.


