Logo
Newsletters
Podcasts
What Can I Do?
Shop
Team
Sponsors
Sign in
fire-simple
Join

It's Called Science.

No Cars Allowed

Apr 21, 2025

•

13 min read

No Cars Allowed
Willow Beck
By Willow Beck

Welcome to the week.

It’s Earth Week, which means it’s the perfect time to take climate action, and what better way that joining the phone banking session with the Environmental Voter Project that Quinn is hosting this Wednesday (April 23rd) at 8 PM ET.

Training is provided if you don’t have any phone banking experience!

Sign up here!

Ok news time.

This Week

Have a great week,

— Willow

{{active_subscriber_count}}+ people who give a shit got this post in their email, for free.

Join up

🙋‍♀️ Vote!

What's your view on restricting cars in city centers?

  • I support car restrictions - they improve quality of life
  • I oppose car restrictions - they limit personal freedom
  • I'm neutral - depends on implementation
  • We need more data before expanding these programs
  • Something else (write in!)

Login or Subscribe to participate

Last week, we asked: Would you support your city or county implementing a small fee (eg., $1 on utility bills) to fund local regenerative agriculture projects?

You said:

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Yes, and I would advocate for it (44%)

“What's not to love about this?”

🟨🟨⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ Yes if it were optional (opt-in) (18%)

“I live in a mixed income neighborhood and I don't think it's fair for low income or struggling neighbors to have to do this. But I also live in a very liberal and community-minded neighborhood (very obvious in how we vote each year) and believe there would be a lot of organic support for this. ”

🟨⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ Yes even if it were automatic (opt-out) (14%)

“Our food system is the base of human energy and must change now if we are to evolve rather than cause further extinction, including of humanity.”

🟨⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ Maybe, I would need more information (13%)

“Organic only.”

⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ No I don't think the local government should be involved in this (5%)

“State and local governments are already misusing the funding tactics related to special fees on utility bills. There is too much mission creep that occurs. ”

⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ No I don't support any additional fees (6%)

“With all the taxes we pay over 60% of take home pay that should cover it.”

New Shit Giver Beth is here because “I'm here because I am a geriatric nurse and although I am at the corporate level now, I was not during the pandemic.  I was a DON over a facility of about 98 residents.  We were the first in the county to have a COVID outbreak and the first to have a death.“

Thank you so much for your service, and thank you for being here!


🤝 Become an Important Member

We’re 100% independent and proudly supported by readers like you.

Members get a 30 day free trial to:

  • Ad-free everything

  • Your What Can I Do? profile: get and keep track of personalized action steps, connect with other Shit Givers

  • Vibe Check: Our news homepage, curated daily just for you. Never doomscroll again, thx

  • Seriously?: The frameworks, models, history, and pop culture we use to understand what’s happening now and next

  • Half Baked: Weekly briefs to help you think and act on specific, timely issues as they happen

  • Not Important: My favorite books, art, movies, music, apps, and more that have nothing to do with the jet stream slowing down

  • Lifetime thanks for directly supporting our work

Start 30 day free trial

Subscribe to keep reading

Our weekly newsletter is free, but we need your email to continue reading. Want access to everything? Join the Important Membership!

Already a subscriber?Sign in.Not now

Join the discussion.

Avatar

or to participate

Related articles

Because you give a shit.

Podcast

Shop

Books

© 2026 Important, Not Important.
Report abusePrivacy policyTerms of use
beehiivPowered by beehiiv